<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Legal on StampD.org – The Time Dimension of Blockchain</title><link>https://stampd.org/categories/legal/</link><description>Recent content in Legal on StampD.org – The Time Dimension of Blockchain</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 02:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://stampd.org/categories/legal/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Blockchain Timestamps and Digital Signature Laws: How Global Legislation Recognized On-Chain Proof of Existence</title><link>https://stampd.org/blockchain-timestamps-and-digital-signature-laws-how-global-legislation-recognized-on-chain-proof-of-existence/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stampd.org/blockchain-timestamps-and-digital-signature-laws-how-global-legislation-recognized-on-chain-proof-of-existence/</guid><description>From the Utah Digital Signature Act (1995) to Italy&amp;rsquo;s DLT Timestamp Law (2019), global legislation has gradually built a legal framework that recognizes blockchain timestamps as valid proof of existence. This article examines how five major legal systems — the US, EU, China, Italy, and international model laws — treat on-chain timestamps, and why the distinction between &amp;lsquo;proving existence&amp;rsquo; and &amp;lsquo;proving identity&amp;rsquo; is the key to understanding their legal status.</description></item><item><title>Blockchain Timestamps as Prior Art: How On-Chain Proof of Existence Is Reshaping Patent Law</title><link>https://stampd.org/blockchain-timestamps-prior-art-patent/</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stampd.org/blockchain-timestamps-prior-art-patent/</guid><description>Blockchain timestamps are emerging as a powerful tool for establishing prior art in patent disputes. From Nym Technologies&amp;rsquo; use of a Bitcoin timestamp to invalidate a patent claim to China&amp;rsquo;s Internet Courts accepting on-chain evidence, this article examines how cryptographic timestamps are reshaping intellectual property law — and why every inventor should timestamp their work on-chain.</description></item><item><title>Blockchain Timestamps vs Traditional Notarization: A 2,000-Year History of Document Authentication</title><link>https://stampd.org/blockchain-timestamps-vs-notarization/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stampd.org/blockchain-timestamps-vs-notarization/</guid><description>From the Lex Cornelia of 81 BCE to Bitcoin&amp;rsquo;s genesis block in 2009, the human need to authenticate documents at a specific point in time has evolved from human witnesses to cryptographic proof. This article compares blockchain timestamps and traditional notarization across five dimensions — cost, speed, security, volume, and legal recognition — and finds that while notarization verifies identity, blockchain timestamps verify existence, together forming a complete system of digital document authentication.</description></item><item><title>Blockchain Timestamps as Legal Evidence: From China's Internet Courts to Global Jurisprudence</title><link>https://stampd.org/blockchain-timestamps-as-legal-evidence-from-chinas-internet-courts-to-global-jurisprudence/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://stampd.org/blockchain-timestamps-as-legal-evidence-from-chinas-internet-courts-to-global-jurisprudence/</guid><description>From China&amp;rsquo;s Supreme People&amp;rsquo;s Court recognizing blockchain evidence in 2018 to the UK High Court accepting Bitcoin timestamps as immutable records, the legal world is increasingly turning to on-chain timestamps as definitive proof of existence. This article examines the convergence of cryptographic timestamping and modern jurisprudence.</description></item></channel></rss>